NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1980 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 2475 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 554.4 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- Around 47% higher pipelines: 7168 vs 4864
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1180 vs 989
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 29969 vs 20394
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 192400 vs 109075
- Around 73% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4627 vs 2671
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1980 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2475 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 554.4 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 7168 vs 4864 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1180 vs 989 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 29969 vs 20394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 192400 vs 109075 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4627 vs 2671 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1180 | 989 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 29969 | 20394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 192400 | 109075 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4627 | 2671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD104 | GA104 |
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 23 | 104 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2475 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1980 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 7168 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 198.0 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 554.4 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |