NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 2340 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2x more boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 689.0 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s
- Around 65% higher pipelines: 8448 vs 5120
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1220 vs 643
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31735 vs 15361
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 222820 vs 92696
- 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5569 vs 2380
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 61.731 vs 36.308
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3080.809 vs 1410.887
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2340 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 689.0 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8448 vs 5120 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1220 vs 643 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31735 vs 15361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 222820 vs 92696 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5569 vs 2380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 61.731 vs 36.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3080.809 vs 1410.887 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 285 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 vs 363.635
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.818 vs 116.521
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 285 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 vs 363.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 vs 116.521 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1220 | 643 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31735 | 15361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 222820 | 92696 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5569 | 2380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 363.635 | 449.647 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 61.731 | 36.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.521 | 181.818 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3080.809 | 1410.887 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD103 | GA104 |
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 22 | 81 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2340 MHz | 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 8448 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 250.6 GPixel/s | 103.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 689.0 GTexel/s | 206.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 45900 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 310 mm, 12.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 672.3 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |