NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 2340 MHz vs 1560 MHz
Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1860 MHz
Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 689.0 GTexel/s vs 625.0 GTexel/s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 285 Watt vs 450 Watt
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31725 vs 29671
Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 224056 vs 205205
Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 24245 vs 22131
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 363.635 vs 259.78
Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3080.809 vs 3026.082

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 Jan 2024 vs 27 Jan 2022
Core clock speed	2340 MHz vs 1560 MHz
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz vs 1860 MHz
Texture fill rate	689.0 GTexel/s vs 625.0 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm vs 8 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	285 Watt vs 450 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	31725 vs 29671
Geekbench - OpenCL	224056 vs 205205
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	24245 vs 22131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	363.635 vs 259.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3080.809 vs 3026.082

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Around 27% higher pipelines: 10752 vs 8448
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1226 vs 1189
Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.049 vs 61.731
Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 177.665 vs 116.521

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	10752 vs 8448
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 16 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1226 vs 1189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	63.049 vs 61.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	177.665 vs 116.521

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1189

1226

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

31725

29671

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

224056

205205

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

24245

22131

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

363.635

259.78

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

61.731

63.049

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

116.521

177.665

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3080.809

3026.082

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	1189	1226
PassMark - G3D Mark	31725	29671
Geekbench - OpenCL	224056	205205
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	24245	22131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	363.635	259.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	61.731	63.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	116.521	177.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3080.809	3026.082

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Code name	AD103	GA102
Launch date	8 Jan 2024	27 Jan 2022
Place in performance rating	24	27
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz	1860 MHz
Core clock speed	2340 MHz	1560 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	8 nm
Pipelines	8448	10752
Pixel fill rate	250.6 GPixel/s	208.3 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	689.0 GTexel/s	625.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	285 Watt	450 Watt
Transistor count	45900 million	28300 million
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance		625.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance		40.00 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance		40.00 TFLOPS
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Triple-slot	Triple-slot
Height	61 mm, 2.4 inches	61 mm, 2.4 inches
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	310 mm, 12.2 inches	336 mm, 13.2 inches
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 16-pin
Width	140 mm, 5.5 inches	140 mm, 5.5 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	672.3 GB/s	1,008 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	384 bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6X