NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 2295 MHz vs 1202 MHz
- Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 2617 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 5303.4x more texture fill rate: 879.3 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 10752 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1401 vs 795
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 36147 vs 11545
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 263511 vs 42289
- 7.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8637 vs 1115
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 Jan 2025 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 2295 MHz vs 1202 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2617 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 879.3 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 10752 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1401 vs 795 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 36147 vs 11545 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 263511 vs 42289 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8637 vs 1115 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 360 Watt
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1875 MHz, 30 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 360 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 1875 MHz, 30 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1401 | 795 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 36147 | 11545 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 263511 | 42289 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8637 | 1115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GB203 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 30 Jan 2025 | 6 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 6 | 287 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
| Price now | $799.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2617 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2295 MHz | 1202 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 293.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 879.3 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 360 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 304 mm, 12 inches | 241 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 137 mm, 5.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz, 30 Gbps effective | 7604 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080 vs
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080 vs
NVIDIARTX 6000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080 vs
NVIDIAH100 PCIe 80 GB
