NVIDIA ION 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA ION 2 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA ION 2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 459 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 21 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 928 vs 499
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 928 vs 499
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 4 October 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 459 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 21 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 928 vs 499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 928 vs 499 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA ION 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA ION 2 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 928 | 499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 928 | 499 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 228 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 47 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA ION 2 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT218 | G86 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 4 October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1668 | 1669 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $37 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.22 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 459 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 21 Watt |
| Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
| Floating-point performance | 29.376 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 3.67 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR2, DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
