NVIDIA GeForce G105M vs NVIDIA ION 2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G105M and NVIDIA ION 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G105M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1314 vs 928
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1314 vs 928
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 3 June 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1314 vs 928 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1314 vs 928 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA ION 2
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
| Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G105M
GPU 2: NVIDIA ION 2
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce G105M | NVIDIA ION 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 63 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 22 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2534 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1314 | 928 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1314 | 928 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce G105M | NVIDIA ION 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | G98 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 3 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1665 | 1668 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 38 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.12 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | VGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 8 (DDR2) / 11 (GDDR3) | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |