NVIDIA A30 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A30 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A30
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 795 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 322.6 GTexel/s vs 313.2 GTexel/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 795 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 322.6 GTexel/s vs 313.2 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.1x more pipelines: 7424 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 165 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1215 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective
Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
Pipelines | 7424 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 165 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1215 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A30
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q
Name | NVIDIA A30 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 127071 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA A30 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | GA100 | AD104 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 99 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 795 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 5.161 TFLOPS (1:2) | 313.2 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.32 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.32 TFLOPS | 20.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 7424 |
Pixel fill rate | 138.2 GPixel/s | 108.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 322.6 GTexel/s | 313.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 54200 million | 35800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 933.1 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 3072 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR6 |