NVIDIA A30X vs NVIDIA Tesla K80
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A30X and NVIDIA Tesla K80 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A30X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 824 MHz
- Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 322.6 GTexel/s vs 171.4 GTexel/s
- Around 44% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2496
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 322.6 GTexel/s vs 171.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2496 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A30X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K80
Name | NVIDIA A30X | NVIDIA Tesla K80 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5852 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA A30X | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GA100 | GK210 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 17 Nov 2014 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 257 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 824 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 562 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 5.161 TFLOPS (1:2) | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.32 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.32 TFLOPS | 4.113 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2496 |
Pixel fill rate | 138.2 GPixel/s | 42.85 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 322.6 GTexel/s | 171.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 54200 million | 7100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1,223 GB/s | 240.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 3072 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR5 |