NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 184 Watt vs 290 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8026 vs 3478
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Dec 2021 vs 31 May 2021 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 184 Watt vs 290 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8026 vs 3478 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 339.8 GTexel/s vs 224.4 GTexel/s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2176
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 850
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23411 vs 15977
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s vs 224.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2176 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 850 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 vs 15977 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 850 | 1051 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 23411 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8026 | 3478 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
Code name | TU106 | GA104 |
Launch date | 7 Dec 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 54 | 66 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 224.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.36 TFLOPS (2:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.181 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2176 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 79.20 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 224.4 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 184 Watt | 290 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |