NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro W6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 4.1x more pipelines: 7424 vs 1792
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19533 vs 15414
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 117943 vs 72987
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Jan 2022 vs 8 Jun 2021 |
Pipelines | 7424 vs 1792 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19533 vs 15414 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117943 vs 72987 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1260 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 292.3 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 964 vs 830
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1260 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 292.3 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 964 vs 830 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 830 | 964 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19533 | 15414 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117943 | 72987 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA103 | Navi 23 |
Launch date | 25 Jan 2022 | 8 Jun 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 63 | 65 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1260 MHz | 2903 MHz |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 2200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 292.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.71 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.71 TFLOPS | 10.40 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 7424 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 121.0 GPixel/s | 185.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 292.3 GTexel/s | 325.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 130 Watt |
Compute units | 28 | |
Transistor count | 11060 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |