NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 4374.4x more texture fill rate: 292.3 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 9.7x more pipelines: 7424 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 650
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19445 vs 6332
- 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 117779 vs 20732
- 9.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2869 vs 305
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Jan 2022 vs 25 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 292.3 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 7424 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 vs 650 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19445 vs 6332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117779 vs 20732 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2869 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1260 MHz
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1260 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 | 650 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19445 | 6332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117779 | 20732 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2869 | 305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA103 | GP107 |
Launch date | 25 Jan 2022 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 77 | 487 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1260 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 292.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.71 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.71 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 7424 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 121.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 292.3 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 75 Watt |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |