NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 4374.4x more texture fill rate: 292.3 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
  • 9.7x more pipelines: 7424 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 650
  • 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19445 vs 6332
  • 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 117779 vs 20732
  • 9.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2869 vs 305
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 Jan 2022 vs 25 October 2016
Texture fill rate 292.3 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Pipelines 7424 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 828 vs 650
PassMark - G3D Mark 19445 vs 6332
Geekbench - OpenCL 117779 vs 20732
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2869 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

  • Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 810 MHz
  • Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1260 MHz
  • Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
Core clock speed 1392 MHz vs 810 MHz
Boost clock speed 1392 MHz vs 1260 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 115 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
828
650
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19445
6332
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
117779
20732
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2869
305
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark 828 650
PassMark - G3D Mark 19445 6332
Geekbench - OpenCL 117779 20732
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2869 305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3336

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Pascal
Code name GA103 GP107
Launch date 25 Jan 2022 25 October 2016
Place in performance rating 77 487
Launch price (MSRP) $139
Price now $159.99
Type Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 46.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1260 MHz 1392 MHz
Core clock speed 810 MHz 1392 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 292.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.71 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 18.71 TFLOPS
Pipelines 7424 768
Pixel fill rate 121.0 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 292.3 GTexel/s 66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 75 Watt
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C
Transistor count 3,300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 145 mm

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 512.0 GB/s 112 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective 7 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready