NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 510 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
| Launch date | 2023 vs 4 Jan 2022 |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz vs 510 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 190.4 GTexel/s vs 128.4 GTexel/s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2560
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
| Texture fill rate | 190.4 GTexel/s vs 128.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5888 vs 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD107 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 4 Jan 2022 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 510 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 190.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.19 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 5888 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.36 GPixel/s | 99.36 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 128.4 GTexel/s | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050
