NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 930 MHz
• Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1080 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 612
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 13637

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 115 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 80223 vs 74538
• 4.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7412 vs 1788

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 612
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14441 13637
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	74538 80223
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1788 7412

Compare specifications (specs)