NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1620 MHz
- 2332.8x more texture fill rate: 181.4 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 3072 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 732 vs 323
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17566 vs 5918
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89106 vs 20732
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 1 February 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1620 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 vs 323 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 vs 5918 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 vs 20732 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 2255
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 vs 2255 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 | 323 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 | 5918 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 | 20732 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 | 2340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Code name | AD107 | GP106B |
| Launch date | 2023 | 1 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 123 | 533 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 60.48 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AppleM1 Max 24-core
