NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 732 vs 564
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17566 vs 7881
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89106 vs 39165
• 7.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2255 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	732 564
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	17566 7881
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	89106 39165
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2255 305

Compare specifications (specs)