NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 215 Watt
- 322.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2255 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 2 July 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 732
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 vs 17566
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98281 vs 89106
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 732 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 vs 17566 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98281 vs 89106 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 | 879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 | 18198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 | 98281 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 | 7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
Code name | AD107 | TU104 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 123 | 129 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 60.48 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 215 Watt |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Transistor count | 13.6 B | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |