NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 211.2 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD107 | AD106 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 123 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz | 2640 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 2505 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS | 13.52 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 60.48 GPixel/s | 84.48 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | 211.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 150 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |