NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 2190 MHz vs 1968 MHz
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4352 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 129915 vs 82703
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 911
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22739 vs 16471
- Around 61% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2913 vs 1804
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1830.143 vs 706.665
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 30 Jul 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2190 MHz vs 1968 MHz |
Pipelines | 4352 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 129915 vs 82703 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 911 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22739 vs 16471 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2913 vs 1804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 vs 706.665 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 2589 MHz vs 2430 MHz
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 331.4 GTexel/s vs 311.0 GTexel/s
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 220 Watt
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz vs 2430 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s vs 311.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 129915 | 82703 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | 911 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22739 | 16471 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2913 | 1804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 | 706.665 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | AD106 | Navi 23 XT |
Launch date | 2023 | 30 Jul 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 72 | 191 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz | 2589 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2190 MHz | 1968 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 330.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS | 10.60 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4352 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 155.5 GPixel/s | 165.7 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 311.0 GTexel/s | 331.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compute units | 32 | |
Transistor count | 11060 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 450 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |