NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1620 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 vs 88096
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 819
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 vs 16112
- Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2302 vs 1569
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 311.253 vs 251.703
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 33.932 vs 27.153
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 169.697 vs 153.341
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 vs 1304.365
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6622.553 vs 3742.063
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 17 October 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1620 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 vs 88096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 vs 819 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 vs 16112 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 vs 1569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 vs 251.703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 vs 27.153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 vs 153.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 vs 1304.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 vs 3742.063 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 88096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 819 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 16112 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | 1569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | 251.703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | 27.153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | 153.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | 1304.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | 3742.063 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD106 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 17 October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 75 | 151 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $499.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

