NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 85% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 vs 40286
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 483
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 vs 7788
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 311.253 vs 157.821
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 33.932 vs 10.833
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 169.697 vs 136.552
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 vs 684.333
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6622.553 vs 1934.012
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 vs 40286 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 vs 483 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 vs 7788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 vs 157.821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 vs 10.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 vs 136.552 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 vs 684.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 vs 1934.012 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 11.1x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 40286 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 483 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 7788 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | 157.821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | 10.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | 136.552 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | 684.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | 1934.012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
Code name | AD106 | TU117 |
Launch date | 2023 | |
Place in performance rating | 75 | 350 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1425 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 855 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | 2.918 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3840 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | 45.60 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | 91.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |