NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3072
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 115 Watt
Pipelines | 4608 vs 3072 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1230 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 181.4 GTexel/s vs 177.1 GTexel/s
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1230 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s vs 177.1 GTexel/s |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 730 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17659 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88873 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10441 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD106 | AD107 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 88 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1230 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 177.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.34 TFLOPS (1:1) | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.34 TFLOPS | 11.61 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4608 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | 60.48 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 177.1 GTexel/s | 181.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 115 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |