NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3840
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date 2023 vs 28 Oct 2020
Pipelines 4608 vs 3840
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 7 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 250 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800

  • Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1695 MHz
  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 976 vs 762
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22194 vs 19556
  • Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 127870 vs 107449
  • Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16218 vs 12488
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 vs 319.688
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 36.174
  • Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 218.946
  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1585.54
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Boost clock speed 2105 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Texture fill rate 505.2 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 976 vs 762
PassMark - G3D Mark 22194 vs 19556
Geekbench - OpenCL 127870 vs 107449
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 16218 vs 12488
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 432.118 vs 319.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 41.585 vs 36.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 383.037 vs 218.946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2280.457 vs 1585.54

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
762
976
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19556
22194
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
107449
127870
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
12488
16218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
319.688
432.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
36.174
41.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
218.946
383.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1585.54
2280.457
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 6800
PassMark - G2D Mark 762 976
PassMark - G3D Mark 19556 22194
Geekbench - OpenCL 107449 127870
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 12488 16218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 319.688 432.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 36.174 41.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 218.946 383.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1585.54 2280.457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3373

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 6800

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace RDNA 2.0
Code name AD106 Navi 21
Launch date 2023 28 Oct 2020
Place in performance rating 79 82
Launch price (MSRP) $579
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1695 MHz 2105 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 1700 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 7 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) 1010 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 15.62 TFLOPS 16.17 TFLOPS
Pipelines 4608 3840
Pixel fill rate 81.36 GPixel/s 202.1 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 244.1 GTexel/s 505.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 250 Watt
Compute units 60
Transistor count 26800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Height 40 mm (1.6 inches)
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
Width 120 mm (4.7 inches)

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.2
OpenCL 3.0 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 256.0 GB/s 512.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6