NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

AMD Radeon RX 6800

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 20% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3840
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt

Launch date	2023 vs 28 Oct 2020
Pipelines	4608 vs 3840
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 7 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt vs 250 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800

Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1695 MHz
2.1x more texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 972 vs 783
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22316 vs 19649
Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 126207 vs 106772
Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16306 vs 12236
Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 vs 319.688
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 36.174
Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 218.946
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1585.54

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	2105 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Texture fill rate	505.2 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	972 vs 783
PassMark - G3D Mark	22316 vs 19649
Geekbench - OpenCL	126207 vs 106772
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	16306 vs 12236
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	432.118 vs 319.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	41.585 vs 36.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	383.037 vs 218.946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2280.457 vs 1585.54

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

783

972

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

19649

22316

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

106772

126207

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

12236

16306

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

319.688

432.118

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

36.174

41.585

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

218.946

383.037

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1585.54

2280.457

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	AMD Radeon RX 6800
PassMark - G2D Mark	783	972
PassMark - G3D Mark	19649	22316
Geekbench - OpenCL	106772	126207
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	12236	16306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	319.688	432.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	36.174	41.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	218.946	383.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1585.54	2280.457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		16162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		16162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3373

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	AMD Radeon RX 6800
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Code name	AD106	Navi 21
Launch date	2023	28 Oct 2020
Place in performance rating	73	75
Launch price (MSRP)		$579
Type		Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	2105 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1700 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	7 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	244.1 GFLOPS (1:64)	1010 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.62 TFLOPS (1:1)	32.33 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	15.62 TFLOPS	16.17 TFLOPS
Pipelines	4608	3840
Pixel fill rate	81.36 GPixel/s	202.1 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	244.1 GTexel/s	505.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt	250 Watt
Compute units		60
Transistor count		26800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin
Height		40 mm (1.6 inches)
Length		267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU)		600 Watt
Width		120 mm (4.7 inches)
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective	2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6