NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3840
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 2023 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 3840 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 976 vs 763
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22199 vs 19552
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 127800 vs 107349
- Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16218 vs 12488
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 vs 319.688
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 36.174
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 218.946
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1585.54
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 976 vs 763 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22199 vs 19552 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 127800 vs 107349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16218 vs 12488 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 vs 319.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 vs 36.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 218.946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 vs 1585.54 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 763 | 976 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19552 | 22199 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107349 | 127800 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12488 | 16218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 319.688 | 432.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 | 41.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 | 383.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 | 2280.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | AD106 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 2023 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 79 | 82 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2105 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4608 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compute units | 60 | |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |