NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 300 Watt
Launch date | 2023 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4608
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1047 vs 763
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26796 vs 19552
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 164019 vs 107349
- Around 68% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20957 vs 12488
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 319.688
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 36.174
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 218.946
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1585.54
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 4608 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 vs 763 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26796 vs 19552 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 164019 vs 107349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20957 vs 12488 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 319.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 36.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 218.946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 1585.54 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 763 | 1047 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19552 | 26796 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107349 | 164019 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12488 | 20957 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 319.688 | 543.753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 | 51.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 | 320.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 | 2566.9 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | AD106 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 2023 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 79 | 76 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4608 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compute units | 80 | |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Triple-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |