NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3840
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 108368 vs 101689
- Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 12598 vs 10613
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 319.688 vs 311.253
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.174 vs 33.932
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.946 vs 169.697
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1585.54 vs 1500.926
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 108368 vs 101689 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12598 vs 10613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 319.688 vs 311.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 vs 33.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 vs 169.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 vs 1500.926 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1087 vs 758
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19789 vs 19584
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1087 vs 758 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19789 vs 19584 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 758 | 1087 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19584 | 19789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 108368 | 101689 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12598 | 10613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 319.688 | 311.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 | 33.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 | 169.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 | 1500.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD106 | AD106 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 75 | 72 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2640 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 2505 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS | 20.28 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4608 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | 126.7 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 316.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 200 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |