NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3840
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109064 vs 101643
- Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2699 vs 2301
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 319.688 vs 311.253
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.174 vs 33.932
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.946 vs 169.697
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1585.54 vs 1500.926
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 3840 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109064 vs 101643 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2699 vs 2301 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 319.688 vs 311.253 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 vs 33.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 vs 169.697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 vs 1500.926 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1082 vs 757
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19745 vs 19535
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1082 vs 757 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19745 vs 19535 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 757 | 1082 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19535 | 19745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109064 | 101643 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2699 | 2301 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 319.688 | 311.253 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 | 33.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 | 169.697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 | 1500.926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | AD106 | AD106 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | 80 | 73 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2640 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 2505 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS | 20.28 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4608 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | 126.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 316.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 200 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs
IntelArc A750
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6850M XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
