NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3840
  • Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 200 Watt
  • Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 108368 vs 101689
  • Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 12598 vs 10613
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 319.688 vs 311.253
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.174 vs 33.932
  • Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.946 vs 169.697
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1585.54 vs 1500.926
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 4608 vs 3840
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 200 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 108368 vs 101689
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 12598 vs 10613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 319.688 vs 311.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 36.174 vs 33.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 218.946 vs 169.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1585.54 vs 1500.926

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

  • Around 80% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1395 MHz
  • Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1695 MHz
  • Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
  • Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1087 vs 758
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19789 vs 19584
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 2505 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Boost clock speed 2640 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Texture fill rate 316.8 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
Memory clock speed 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 1087 vs 758
PassMark - G3D Mark 19789 vs 19584

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
758
1087
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19584
19789
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
108368
101689
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
12598
10613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
319.688
311.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
36.174
33.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
218.946
169.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1585.54
1500.926
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
PassMark - G2D Mark 758 1087
PassMark - G3D Mark 19584 19789
Geekbench - OpenCL 108368 101689
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 12598 10613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 319.688 311.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 36.174 33.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 218.946 169.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1585.54 1500.926
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6622.553

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
Code name AD106 AD106
Launch date 2023 2023
Place in performance rating 75 72

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1695 MHz 2640 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 2505 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 4 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 15.62 TFLOPS 20.28 TFLOPS
Pipelines 4608 3840
Pixel fill rate 81.36 GPixel/s 126.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 244.1 GTexel/s 316.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 200 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP Dual-slot
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 12-pin
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 256.0 GB/s 288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6