NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
2.1x more core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1076 MHz
Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1480 MHz
6613.2x more texture fill rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
10x more pipelines: 7680 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
2.4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 5 GB
Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1198 vs 630
4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31655 vs 6957
Around 70% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5024 vs 2958
9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205069 vs 22896
8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 113.416
10x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 67.426 vs 6.736
4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 81.206
6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2895.895 vs 417.823

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 Jan 2023 vs 6 February 2017
Core clock speed	2310 MHz vs 1076 MHz
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz vs 1480 MHz
Texture fill rate	626.4 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	7680 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 16 nm
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1198 vs 630
PassMark - G3D Mark	31655 vs 6957
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5024 vs 2958
Geekbench - OpenCL	205069 vs 22896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	939.363 vs 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	67.426 vs 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	348.259 vs 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2895.895 vs 417.823

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

3.8x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 285 Watt
5.3x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 285 Watt
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1198

630

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

31655

6957

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

5024

2958

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

205069

22896

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

939.363

113.416

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

67.426

6.736

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

348.259

81.206

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2895.895

417.823

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
PassMark - G2D Mark	1198	630
PassMark - G3D Mark	31655	6957
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5024	2958
Geekbench - OpenCL	205069	22896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	939.363	113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	67.426	6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	348.259	81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2895.895	417.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.794
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3316

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Code name	AD104	GP106
Launch date	3 Jan 2023	6 February 2017
Place in performance rating	8	387
Launch price (MSRP)		$585
Price now		$429.99
Type		Workstation
Value for money (0-100)		19.44
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz	1480 MHz
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	1076 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	626.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	40.09 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	40.09 TFLOPS
Pipelines	7680	768
Pixel fill rate	208.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	626.4 GTexel/s	94.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	285 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	35800 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		3,031 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	4x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Height	42 mm, 1.7 inches
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	285 mm, 11.2 inches	201 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None
Width	112 mm, 4.4 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	504.2 GB/s	140.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR5