NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 44% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1607 MHz
  • Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1771 MHz
  • 1694.4x more texture fill rate: 480.2 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2560
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 131.3x more memory clock speed: 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
  • 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 168049 vs 55548
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 417.133 vs 150.103
  • 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 55.476 vs 14.035
  • 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 245.639 vs 27.417
  • 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2459.317 vs 819.934
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2023 vs 15 August 2016
Core clock speed 2310 MHz vs 1607 MHz
Boost clock speed 2610 MHz vs 1771 MHz
Texture fill rate 480.2 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 5888 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 16 nm
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 168049 vs 55548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 417.133 vs 150.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 55.476 vs 14.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 245.639 vs 27.417
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2459.317 vs 819.934

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)

  • Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 285 Watt
  • Around 87% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7209 vs 3854
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 180 Watt vs 285 Watt
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7209 vs 3854

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
168049
55548
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3854
7209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
417.133
150.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
55.476
14.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
245.639
27.417
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2459.317
819.934
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
PassMark - G2D Mark 1166
PassMark - G3D Mark 26959
Geekbench - OpenCL 168049 55548
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3854 7209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 417.133 150.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 55.476 14.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 245.639 27.417
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2459.317 819.934
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2036.763
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 4646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 4646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4195

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace Pascal
Code name AD104 GP104
Launch date 2023 15 August 2016
Place in performance rating 35 254
Launch price (MSRP) $499.99
Price now $439.99
Type Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 43.70

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2610 MHz 1771 MHz
Core clock speed 2310 MHz 1607 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 480.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 30.74 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 30.74 TFLOPS
Pipelines 5888 2560
Pixel fill rate 167.0 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 480.2 GTexel/s 283.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 285 Watt 180 Watt
Transistor count 35800 million 7,200 million
CUDA cores 2560
Floating-point performance 9,068 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 94 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI
G-SYNC support
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Height 61 mm, 2.4 inches
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 336 mm, 13.2 inches
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 12-pin
Width 140 mm, 5.5 inches
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 504.2 GB/s 320 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective 10 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
SLI
Virtual Reality
VR Ready