NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1771 MHz
- 1694.4x more texture fill rate: 480.2 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 131.3x more memory clock speed: 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 168049 vs 55548
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 417.133 vs 150.103
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 55.476 vs 14.035
- 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 245.639 vs 27.417
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2459.317 vs 819.934
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 15 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 1771 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 480.2 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 168049 vs 55548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 417.133 vs 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 55.476 vs 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 245.639 vs 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2459.317 vs 819.934 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 285 Watt
- Around 87% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7209 vs 3854
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 285 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 vs 3854 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1166 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26959 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 168049 | 55548 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3854 | 7209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 417.133 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 55.476 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 245.639 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2459.317 | 819.934 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
Code name | AD104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 2023 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 35 | 254 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 1771 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 480.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 30.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 167.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 480.2 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 336 mm, 13.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |