NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 633 MHz
- 10183.8x more texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 50.6 GTexel / s
- 40.5x more pipelines: 9728 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 18.3x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 896 MB
Launch date | 2023 vs 16 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1335 MHz vs 633 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 50.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 9728 vs 240 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 896 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2268 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 2268 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | AD103 | GT200B |
Launch date | 2023 | 16 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 39 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 633 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 9728 | 240 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 50.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 219 Watt |
Transistor count | 45900 million | 1,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 896 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 127.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 448 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2268 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |