NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 58% higher pipelines: 15360 vs 9728
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Pipelines | 15360 vs 9728 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 428.7x more texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 976 vs 766
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27541 vs 23883
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 179576 vs 142896
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1335 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 5 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 976 vs 766 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27541 vs 23883 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 179576 vs 142896 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 976 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23883 | 27541 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 142896 | 179576 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4908 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD102 | AD103 |
Place in performance rating | 37 | 35 |
Launch date | 2023 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1335 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Pipelines | 15360 | 9728 |
Pixel fill rate | 440.9 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 1,202 GTexel/s | 515.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 76300 million | 45900 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |