NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s
- 5.4x more pipelines: 9728 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 976 vs 879
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27541 vs 15124
- 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4908 vs 1493
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 179576 vs 72885
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 13 Oct 2021 |
| Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 9728 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 976 vs 879 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 27541 vs 15124 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4908 vs 1493 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 179576 vs 72885 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1626 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2491 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 132 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1626 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2491 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 976 | 879 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 27541 | 15124 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4908 | 1493 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 179576 | 72885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.228 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD103 | Navi 23 XL |
| Launch date | 2023 | 13 Oct 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 35 | 36 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2491 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1626 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS | 8.928 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 9728 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 159.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 279.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 132 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45900 million | 11060 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6950 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
