NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 2355 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2625 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 87% higher pipelines: 18176 vs 9728
- 3x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 16 GB
Core clock speed | 2355 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2625 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Pipelines | 18176 vs 9728 |
Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 16 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- 345.6x more texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 800 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 800 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 978 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27784 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21530 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 179564 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD102 | AD103 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 21 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2625 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2355 MHz | 1335 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,491 GFLOPS (1:64) | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 95.42 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 95.42 TFLOPS | 32.98 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 18176 | 9728 |
Pixel fill rate | 504.0 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 1,491 GTexel/s | 515.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 800 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 76300 million | 45900 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | IGP |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 336 mm, 13.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 1200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 16-pin | None |
Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1,152 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |