NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 2235 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 2520 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1297 vs 592
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38287 vs 10616
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 582.642 vs 127.622
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 98.472 vs 18.798
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.756 vs 119.936
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2968.159 vs 910.721
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317791 vs 61276
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 vs 13 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 2235 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2520 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1297 vs 592 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 38287 vs 10616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 582.642 vs 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 98.472 vs 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.756 vs 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2968.159 vs 910.721 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 317791 vs 61276 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 450 Watt
- 7.6x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 450 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1297 | 592 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 38287 | 10616 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 582.642 | 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 98.472 | 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.756 | 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2968.159 | 910.721 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 317791 | 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 3026.812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
Code name | AD102 | TU104 |
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 13 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 13 | 270 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2520 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2235 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,290 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 82.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 16384 | |
Pixel fill rate | 443.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 1,290 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 76300 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 304 mm, 12 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
Width | 137 mm, 5.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 1,008 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 10000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X |