NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1110 vs 592
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13725 vs 10616
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72896 vs 61276
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.704 vs 127.622
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3385.355 vs 3026.812
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.913 vs 18.798
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 240.964 vs 119.936
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1030.098 vs 910.721
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 13 September 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1110 vs 592 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13725 vs 10616 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72896 vs 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 vs 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 vs 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 vs 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 vs 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 vs 910.721 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1110 | 592 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13725 | 10616 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72896 | 61276 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 | 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 | 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 | 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 | 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 | 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU104 |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 13 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 114 | 270 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3328 | |
Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 167 mm, 6.6 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 10000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |