NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 369.6 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- Around 47% higher pipelines: 7168 vs 4864
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 20 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 989
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21280 vs 20394
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 142326 vs 109075
- Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3196 vs 2671
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 7168 vs 4864 |
Maximum memory size | 20 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 989 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21280 vs 20394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 142326 vs 109075 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3196 vs 2671 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 989 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21280 | 20394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 142326 | 109075 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3196 | 2671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA102 | GA104 |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 55 | 104 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 739.2 GFLOPS (1:32) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 7168 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 640.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |