NVIDIA T1000 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T1000 and AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 1268.2x more texture fill rate: 78.12 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 21 December 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 78.12 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1065 MHz
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1065 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
Name | NVIDIA T1000 | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37791 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3182 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 971 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 971 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1980 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T1000 | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Bonaire |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 587 | 584 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 78.12 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.000 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.500 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 896 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.64 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 78.12 GTexel/s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 183 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 104.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 6500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |