NVIDIA T400 4GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- 760.7x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 665 vs 548
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3799 vs 3572
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17251 vs 12020
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 22 July 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 68 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 vs 548 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3799 vs 3572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17251 vs 12020 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 | 548 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3799 | 3572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17251 | 12020 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | TU117 | GM107 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 273 | 787 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
Price now | $343.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 1046 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 44.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 68 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 202 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |