NVIDIA T400 4GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 152x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 665 vs 542
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3799 vs 1132
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 7 November 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 vs 542 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3799 vs 1132 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 420 MHz
- 4.2x more pipelines: 2x 800 vs 384
- Around 59% higher memory clock speed: 1990 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Pipelines | 2x 800 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 | 542 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3799 | 1132 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17251 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | TU117 | R700 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 7 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 273 | 275 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $420 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 2x 800 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 956 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 2x 63.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1990 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |