NVIDIA T400 4GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 152x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
  • 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 665 vs 542
  • 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3799 vs 1132
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 May 2021 vs 7 November 2008
Texture fill rate 34.20 GTexel/s vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 665 vs 542
PassMark - G3D Mark 3799 vs 1132

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

  • Around 49% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 420 MHz
  • 4.2x more pipelines: 2x 800 vs 384
  • Around 59% higher memory clock speed: 1990 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Core clock speed 625 MHz vs 420 MHz
Pipelines 2x 800 vs 384
Memory clock speed 1990 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
665
542
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3799
1132
Name NVIDIA T400 4GB ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
PassMark - G2D Mark 665 542
PassMark - G3D Mark 3799 1132
Geekbench - OpenCL 17251

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA T400 4GB ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

Essentials

Architecture Turing TeraScale
Code name TU117 R700
Launch date 6 May 2021 7 November 2008
Place in performance rating 273 275
Launch price (MSRP) $420
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1425 MHz
Core clock speed 420 MHz 625 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 55 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1,094 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 2x 800
Pixel fill rate 22.80 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 34.20 GTexel/s 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 956 million
Floating-point performance 2x 1,000.0 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 4x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Single-slot
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU) 200 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12 (12_1) 10.1
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3
Shader Model 6.7 (6.4)
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2x 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 80.00 GB/s 2x 63.7 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective 1990 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR3