NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 761.8x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 2x 800
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5852 vs 1132
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 vs 7 November 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 2x 800 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5852 vs 1132 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 59% higher memory clock speed: 1990 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 374
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 374 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 542 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5852 | 1132 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GK210 | R700 |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 7 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 256 | 253 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $420 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2496 | 2x 800 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 956 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 2x 63.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 1990 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |