NVIDIA Tesla P10 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P10 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P10
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- 2607.7x more texture fill rate: 358.3 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1792
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 358.3 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1792 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1025 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1808 MHz, 14.5 Gbps effective
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 13 Sep 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1114 MHz vs 1025 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1808 MHz, 14.5 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P10
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P10 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9083 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 700 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102892 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P10 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP102 | GP104 |
Launch date | 13 Sep 2016 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 108 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1025 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 358.3 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 179.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.47 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 143.3 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 358.3 GTexel/s | 137.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 11800 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 97 mm, 3.8 inches | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 694.3 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1808 MHz, 14.5 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |