NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 4200M and NVIDIA GeForce 9400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 4200M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 40% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 580 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 287 vs 101
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 78 vs 55
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.559 vs 0.537
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1726 vs 1117
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1726 vs 1117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 25 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 4200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	287 101
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	78 55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.559 0.537
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1726 1117
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1726 1117

Compare specifications (specs)