NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 4200M and NVIDIA NVS 3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 4200M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 606 MHz
- Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 6.48 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 46.98 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 287 vs 116
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 78 vs 35
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 688 vs 578
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1726 vs 988
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 688 vs 578
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1726 vs 988
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 606 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops vs 46.98 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 287 vs 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 vs 35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 688 vs 578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1726 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 688 vs 578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1726 vs 988 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 3100M
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2905 vs 1155
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2905 vs 1155 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 4200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 4200M | NVIDIA NVS 3100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 287 | 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 | 35 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1155 | 2905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 103.797 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.826 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.836 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 688 | 578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1726 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 688 | 578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1726 | 988 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 4200M | NVIDIA NVS 3100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF119 | GT218 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1640 | 1642 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 606 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | 46.98 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s | 4.85 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 12.64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1580 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |