NVIDIA P102-100 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P102-100 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P102-100
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 316.4 GTexel / s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 3200 vs 1536
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 10,125 gflops vs 3,656 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64572 vs 27127
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.4 GTexel / s vs 114.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3200 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops vs 3,656 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64572 vs 27127 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P102-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P102-100 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64572 | 27127 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6556 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8931 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8931 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P102-100 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP102 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 12 February 2018 | 1 February 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 324 | 327 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops | 3,656 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 3200 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 316.4 GTexel / s | 114.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | IGP |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 400.3 GB / s | 204.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | HBM2 |
Shared memory | 0 |