NVIDIA P104-100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P104-100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P104-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1006 MHz
- Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 128.8 billion / sec
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 3,090.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2048 MB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51497 vs 18412
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 vs 22 March 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1006 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 128.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 3,090.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2048 MB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 vs 18412 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 123
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5566 vs 3707
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 123 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5566 vs 3707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P104-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P104-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 | 18412 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 123 | 530 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3707 | 5566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.086 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P104-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP104 | GK104 |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 557 | 560 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $579.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1006 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 3,090.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 128.8 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 10.0" (25.4 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2048 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |