NVIDIA P106-090 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-090 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 73.49 GTexel / s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,352 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19027 vs 9582
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2343 vs 2271
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.225 vs 45.905
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1309.517 vs 495.238
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 183.725 vs 145.794
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.178 vs 2.365
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.651 vs 38.965
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 July 2017 vs 17 May 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 937 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 73.49 GTexel / s vs 46.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops vs 1,127 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19027 vs 9582 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2343 vs 2271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.225 vs 45.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1309.517 vs 495.238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 183.725 vs 145.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.178 vs 2.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.651 vs 38.965 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 214 vs 101
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 vs 101 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P106-090 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19027 | 9582 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 101 | 214 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2343 | 2271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.225 | 45.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1309.517 | 495.238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 183.725 | 145.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.178 | 2.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.651 | 38.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 994 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P106-090 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP106 | GP108 |
Launch date | 31 July 2017 | 17 May 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 912 | 913 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 937 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 73.49 GTexel / s | 46.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 48.06 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |