NVIDIA P106-090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-090 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 73.49 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 2,352 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5616 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19027 vs 6673
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.225 vs 18.462
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1309.517 vs 427.88
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 183.725 vs 61.965
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.178 vs 1.899
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.651 vs 23.742
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 July 2017 vs 1 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 73.49 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops vs 1,244 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 5616 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19027 vs 6673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.225 vs 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1309.517 vs 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 183.725 vs 61.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.178 vs 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.651 vs 23.742 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 421 vs 104
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 2448
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 vs 104 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 vs 2448 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P106-090 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19027 | 6673 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 104 | 421 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2448 | 2723 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.225 | 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1309.517 | 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 183.725 | 61.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.178 | 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.651 | 23.742 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P106-090 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP106 | GK106 |
Launch date | 31 July 2017 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 888 | 890 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
Price now | $225.65 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 73.49 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 134.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5616 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |