NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon HD 8830M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon HD 8830M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3x more boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 2695
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 2695
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 June 2017 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 vs 2695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 vs 2695 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8830M
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5106 vs 1860
- 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11302 vs 1680
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5106 vs 1860
- 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11302 vs 1680
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5106 vs 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11302 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5106 vs 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11302 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8830M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA P106-100 | AMD Radeon HD 8830M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6724 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 251 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36174 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 | 2695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1860 | 5106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 11302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 | 2695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1860 | 5106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 11302 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 899 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA P106-100 | AMD Radeon HD 8830M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP106 | Venus |
| Launch date | 19 June 2017 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 439 | 437 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA P106-100 with others
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GTX
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDFirePro W8000
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8830M
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 270X
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 285
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 v2
