NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 84 GTexel / s
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 180 Watt
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6724 vs 4869
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 63.87
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 1314.72
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 6.354
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 315.412
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 8068
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 8068

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X

• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 vs 251
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 vs 76.32
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 1860
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1680
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 1860
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1680
• Around 97% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1772 vs 899

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6724 4869
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	251 613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 63.87
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 1314.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 6.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 85.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 315.412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	899 1772

Compare specifications (specs)