NVIDIA P106-100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 837 MHz
• Around 95% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 876 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 1334.7x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36274 vs 24431
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 62.027
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 1218.137
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 5.835
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 vs 36.842
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 215.546
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 10176
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 10176
• Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4072 vs 2901

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

• Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 136.7 GTexel / s
• 2.1x more pipelines: 2688 vs 1280
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 4,375 gflops
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8194 vs 6443
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 245
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1680
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6443 8194
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	245 636
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36274 24431
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 215.546
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4072 2901

Compare specifications (specs)