NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD FirePro W4300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 3.1x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6541 vs 2813
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36283 vs 11008
• 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 31.528
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 828.57
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 2.986
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 vs 59.153
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 152.484
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 3572
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 3572

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 633 vs 246
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 1860
• 10.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 1680
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 1860
• 10.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6541 2813
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	246 633
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36283 11008
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 828.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 2.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 152.484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 17597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 17597

Compare specifications (specs)