NVIDIA P106-100 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA P106-100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA P106-100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 837 MHz
- Environ 95% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 876 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 1334.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34722 versus 23870
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 versus 62.027
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 versus 1218.137
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 versus 5.835
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 versus 36.842
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 versus 215.546
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 versus 10176
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 versus 10176
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4062 versus 2901
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 June 2017 versus 19 February 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 837 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34722 versus 23870 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 versus 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 versus 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 versus 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 versus 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 versus 215.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 versus 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 versus 10176 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4062 versus 2901 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 187.5 billion / sec versus 136.7 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 2688 versus 1280
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,709 gflops versus 4,375 gflops
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 versus 6357
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 versus 255
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 1860
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 1680
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 1860
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 1680
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 187.5 billion / sec versus 136.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,709 gflops versus 4,375 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 versus 6357 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 versus 255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 1680 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA P106-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6357 | 8190 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34722 | 23870 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 | 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 | 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 | 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 | 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 | 215.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1860 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1860 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4062 | 2901 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA P106-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP106 | GK110 |
| Date de sortie | 19 June 2017 | 19 February 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 425 | 428 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $2,054.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops | 4,709 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2688 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 7,080 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2688 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 250 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA P106-100 avec des autres
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4350
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 560v
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 280
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X
