NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and ATI Radeon HD 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.8x more pipelines: 192 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 11.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 82
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 227
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 386
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 386
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 December 2010 vs 4 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 vs 82 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2668 vs 386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2668 vs 386 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | ATI Radeon HD 3200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 | 82 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 227 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.229 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1600 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2668 | 386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1600 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2668 | 386 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | ATI Radeon HD 3200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | RV6xx |
Code name | GF106 | RS780M |
Launch date | 24 December 2010 | 4 June 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 1287 | 1289 |
Price now | $87.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.65 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 181 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |